![chicago gang book 2018 pdf chicago gang book 2018 pdf](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/329400302_Frat_boys_bossmen_studs_and_gentlemen_A_typology_of_gang_masculinities/links/5c06a551299bf169ae317301/largepreview.png)
Digital trace data has been used to analyze gang communications on social media sites such as Twitter ( Patton et al. Using recent advances in data collection and big data techniques, we created a data set that encompasses 23 months of interactions on a public Latina/o gang Facebook page. To answer our research questions, we use Chicago’s Latina/o gangs as a case study. Is the online network of negative gang-related interactions related to geographic proximity of gangs? We build upon previous literature about gangs as groups, as well as gangs in online spaces, to answer the following research questions: This is important as gangs are not mere aggregates of individuals gangs members’ behavior responds to unique group processes, such as the processes of status attainment and the development of norms and cohesion ( Decker, Melde, and Pyrooz 2013 McGloin and Collins 2015). We also investigate whether geographic proximity is related to negative gang interactions by comparing the online interaction network to the geographic proximity of gangs. As discussed below we operationalize context from material posted on social media and interactions from positive and negative comments that take place under posts. The purpose of this study is to examine the types of contexts and interactions that take place in online spaces and assess how context influences the type of interaction that takes place between gangs. Or does the online environment enable and encourage negative interactions between gangs that are not geographically proximate? If there is no relationship between negative interactions and geographic proximity online, this undermines the parallelism hypothesis ( Pyrooz, Decker, and Moule, 2015) and suggests internet banging may be less likely to promote real-world violence. 2013 Tita and Radil 2011)? If they are, this would support the parallelism hypothesis. For example, are negative online interactions related to rivalries of gangs in close geographic proximity, as in the physical space ( Brantingham et al.
![chicago gang book 2018 pdf chicago gang book 2018 pdf](https://media.nbcchicago.com/2019/09/CCC-black-souls.png)
It directly addresses whether or not our understanding of physical space and its gang-associated characteristics is transferrable to online spaces.
![chicago gang book 2018 pdf chicago gang book 2018 pdf](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/319981209_The_colors_of_violence_Cultural_identities_religion_and_conflict_Sudhir_Kakar_University_of_Chicago_Press_1995_232_pp/links/5b95e90692851c78c40af330/largepreview.png)
In seeking to understand the implications of internet banging, this paper illuminates the relationship between community characteristics and online interactions between gangs.
CHICAGO GANG BOOK 2018 PDF OFFLINE
It will also shed light on whether or not online and offline behaviors are indeed occurring in parallel. Following the perspective that situational analyzes of behavior lead to greater understanding of criminal acts ( Birkbeck and LaFree 1993), we argue that better understanding of how tension between gangs builds online will illuminate the relationship between online and offline gang behaviors. The parallelism hypothesis ( Pyrooz, Decker, and Moule 2015), for example, suggests online behavior converges with and mimics offline behavior, whereas others have argued social media may actually transform gang behaviors rather than simply reproducing them ( Stuart 2020). Further, where researchers have explored this topic, they are not in agreement regarding how online and offline influence one another. Given the newness of internet banging, our understanding of how it differs or overlaps with in-person gangbanging is limited. Gang members carry guns to gangbang in the neighborhood and carry smart phones to “internet bang” on “The Book.” ( Patton, Eschmann, and Butler 2013). In particular, trading insults and disrespecting rival gangs- “gangbanging”-now takes place in both physical and digital spaces. In the digital age, however, gang interactions take place in online environments as well (i.e., on the digital street, Lane 2016). Historically, research has focused on interactions between members of rival gangs on street corners ( Papachristos, Hureau, and Braga 2013 Short and Strodtbeck 1965). Gang group processes and interactions play a significant role in gang violence.